<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Setting your price</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ourstartupstory.com/setting-your-price/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ourstartupstory.com/setting-your-price/</link>
	<description>Tracking the journey of some startups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wilker</title>
		<link>http://www.ourstartupstory.com/setting-your-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2607</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wilker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourstartupstory.com/?p=305#comment-2607</guid>
		<description>Yeah, ditto what Tom said. Price is tough. It seems to be you&#039;re either &quot;enterprise&quot; priced, and (in our case) small shops and developers can&#039;t afford it, so they have to choose, established event (WWDC, or MAX) or our event. Or priced low enough for those indies and smaller shops to get in, but look &quot;cheap&quot; even when it&#039;s not accurate.  
 
Man, this is a good one! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, ditto what Tom said. Price is tough. It seems to be you&#039;re either &quot;enterprise&quot; priced, and (in our case) small shops and developers can&#039;t afford it, so they have to choose, established event (WWDC, or MAX) or our event. Or priced low enough for those indies and smaller shops to get in, but look &quot;cheap&quot; even when it&#039;s not accurate.  </p>
<p>Man, this is a good one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.ourstartupstory.com/setting-your-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2605</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourstartupstory.com/?p=305#comment-2605</guid>
		<description>I wonder the same thing about our conferences all the time.  We offer more per show for less money than other shows.  I wonder if many people bypass us because we&#039;re perceived as &quot;cheap&quot;.  Also </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder the same thing about our conferences all the time.  We offer more per show for less money than other shows.  I wonder if many people bypass us because we&#039;re perceived as &quot;cheap&quot;.  Also</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffry Houser</title>
		<link>http://www.ourstartupstory.com/setting-your-price/comment-page-1/#comment-2592</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffry Houser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourstartupstory.com/?p=305#comment-2592</guid>
		<description> 
 This is definitely something I struggled with for Flextras.   We make the assumption that it&#039;ll take 4x as long for us to prepare something w/ optimal reuse than it would take for a programmer to build it &quot;Good enough&quot; for their own application.   
 
 So, if we spend 8-12 weeks building a component, we anticipate the programmer can do a &quot;Good enough&quot; version themselves in 2-4 weeks, or less if they have a jumping point, such as a similar open source project. 
 
 We price our single domain edition at a 3-6 of Flex consultant time; and a Unlimited Domain w/ Source edition at a 1-3 days of Flex Consultant time; depending how much the Flex Consultant makes an hour. 
 
 By providing a no cost developer edition we hope to boost the perceived value. The programmers can prove, hands down, that the component works in their application w/o any money leaving hands.  That makes Flextras a bit unique in its space. 
 
 I believe Flextras has a good mix, but I&#039;m not convinced I&#039;m communicating it well in our marketing materials.  I also feel that there is perceived price for certain types of products and it may be hard to get people to get their heads around a different pricing model.   
 
 The music industry is a great example of people not getting their heads around new business models.   
 
 This post is definitely good brain food.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is definitely something I struggled with for Flextras.   We make the assumption that it&#039;ll take 4x as long for us to prepare something w/ optimal reuse than it would take for a programmer to build it &quot;Good enough&quot; for their own application.   </p>
<p> So, if we spend 8-12 weeks building a component, we anticipate the programmer can do a &quot;Good enough&quot; version themselves in 2-4 weeks, or less if they have a jumping point, such as a similar open source project. </p>
<p> We price our single domain edition at a 3-6 of Flex consultant time; and a Unlimited Domain w/ Source edition at a 1-3 days of Flex Consultant time; depending how much the Flex Consultant makes an hour. </p>
<p> By providing a no cost developer edition we hope to boost the perceived value. The programmers can prove, hands down, that the component works in their application w/o any money leaving hands.  That makes Flextras a bit unique in its space. </p>
<p> I believe Flextras has a good mix, but I&#039;m not convinced I&#039;m communicating it well in our marketing materials.  I also feel that there is perceived price for certain types of products and it may be hard to get people to get their heads around a different pricing model.   </p>
<p> The music industry is a great example of people not getting their heads around new business models.   </p>
<p> This post is definitely good brain food.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
